The seesawing over the fate of the administration building at Mitchell Field has gone on for too long. I’m writing in support of removing the building; Article 3 on the June 10 ballot.
A number of years ago, I indicated that I would support the renovation of the building as a meeting place for various organizations and a small library. But as we all know, times change. I no longer view the building as appropriate for what various organizations feel they require, but instead see the building as a white elephant — old, decrepit, toxic and occupying the best waterfront space at Mitchell Field.
Some years back, a landscape consultant drew preliminary plans for the property. At that time, they stated that the town had been given something very special, with nothing like it along the East Coast, so it should be careful with it. I agree.
Mitchell Field has become well loved for passive recreation, especially at the waterfront — the most beautiful part of the property. There is a town consensus that that is how it should remain. The building of the much-needed boat ramp will conceivably create congestion along the waterfront. Keeping the administration building will only exacerbate that issue, while its removal will open up the waterfront in ways we can only imagine.
My vision for Mitchell Field originally was extremely narrow, and over the years it has changed dramatically. I don’t believe the waterfront is the place for a community building and private events space. The West Harpswell School sits empty; why not use it?
Imagine the Mitchell Field waterfront unencumbered by the old building; trees lining the road for shade, additional walking paths, strategic picnic and parking areas, perhaps a play area for children. A modern, glass-walled events and recreation building does not fit that vison.
Helen A. Norton, Harpswell Neck
